6.7. Replication Features and Known Problems

MySQL 5.0

previous page next page

6.7. Replication Features and Known Problems

In general, replication compatibility at the SQL level requires that any features used be supported by both the master and the slave servers. If you use a feature on a master server that is available only as of a given version of MySQL, you cannot replicate to a slave that is older than that version. Such incompatibilities are likely to occur between series, so that, for example, you cannot replicate from MySQL 5.0 to 4.1. However, these incompatibilities also can occur for within-series replication. For example, the SLEEP() function is available in MySQL 5.0.12 and up. If you use this function on the master server, you cannot replicate to a slave server that is older than MySQL 5.0.12.

If you are planning to use replication between 5.0 and a previous version of MySQL you should consult the edition of the MySQL Reference Manual corresponding to the earlier release series for information regarding the replication characteristics of that series.

The following list provides details about what is supported and what is not. Additional InnoDB-specific information about replication is given in Section 14.2.6.5, “InnoDB and MySQL Replication”.

Replication issues with regard to stored routines and triggers is described in Section 17.4, “Binary Logging of Stored Routines and Triggers”.

Known issue: In MySQL 5.0.17, the syntax for CREATE TRIGGER changed to include a DEFINER clause for specifying which access privileges to check at trigger invocation time. (See Section 18.1, “CREATE TRIGGER Syntax”, for more information.) However, if you attempt to replicate from a master server older than MySQL 5.0.17 to a slave running MySQL 5.0.17 through 5.0.19, replication of CREATE TRIGGER statements fails on the slave with a Definer not fully qualified error. A workaround is to create triggers on the master using a version-specific comment embedded in each CREATE TRIGGER statement:
```
CREATE /*!50017 DEFINER = 'root'@'localhost' */ TRIGGER ... ;
```
CREATE TRIGGER statements written this way will replicate to newer slaves, which pick up the DEFINER clause from the comment and execute successfully.

This slave problem is fixed as of MySQL 5.0.20.
Replication of AUTO_INCREMENT, LAST_INSERT_ID(), and TIMESTAMP values is done correctly.

However, adding an AUTO_INCREMENT column to a table with ALTER TABLE might not produce the same ordering of the rows on the slave and the master. This occurs because the order in which the rows are numbered depends on the specific storage engine used for the table and the order in which the rows were inserted. If it is important to have the same order on the master and slave, the rows must be ordered before assigning an AUTO_INCREMENT number. Assuming that you want to add an AUTO_INCREMENT column to the table t1, the following statements produce a new table t2 identical to t1 but with an AUTO_INCREMENT column:
```
CREATE TABLE t2 (id INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY) 
SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY col1, col2;
```
This assumes that the table t1 has columns col1 and col2.

This set of statements will also produce a new table t2 identical to t1, with the addition of an AUTO_INCREMENT column:
```
CREATE TABLE t2 LIKE t1;
ALTER TABLE T2 ADD id INT AUTO_INCREMENT PRIMARY KEY;
INSERT INTO t2 SELECT * FROM t1 ORDER BY col1, col2;
```
Important: To guarantee the same ordering on both master and slave, all columns of t1 must be referenced in the ORDER BY clause.

Regardless of the method used to create and populate the copy having the AUTO_INCREMENT column, the final step is to drop the original table and then rename the copy:
```
DROP t1;
ALTER TABLE t2 RENAME t1;
```
See also Section A.7.1, “Problems with ALTER TABLE”.
The USER(), UUID(), and LOAD_FILE() functions are replicated without change and thus do not work reliably on the slave.
As of MySQL 5.0.13, the SYSDATE() function is no longer equivalent to NOW(). Implications are that SYSDATE() is not replication-safe because it is not affected by SET TIMESTAMP statements in the binary log and is non-deterministic. To avoid this, you can start the server with the --sysdate-is-now option to cause SYSDATE() to be an alias for NOW().
User privileges are replicated only if the mysql database is replicated. That is, the GRANT, REVOKE, SET PASSWORD, CREATE USER, and DROP USER statements take effect on the slave only if the replication setup includes the mysql database.

If you're replicating all databases, but don't want statements that affect user privileges to be replicated, set up the slave to not replicate the mysql database, using the --replicate-wild-ignore-table=mysql.% option. The slave will recognize that issuing privilege-related SQL statements won't have an effect, and thus not execute those statements.
The GET_LOCK(), RELEASE_LOCK(), IS_FREE_LOCK(), and IS_USED_LOCK() functions that handle user-level locks are replicated without the slave knowing the concurrency context on master. Therefore, these functions should not be used to insert into a master's table because the content on the slave would differ. (For example, do not issue a statement such as INSERT INTO mytable VALUES(GET_LOCK(...)).)
The FOREIGN_KEY_CHECKS, SQL_MODE, UNIQUE_CHECKS, and SQL_AUTO_IS_NULL variables are all replicated in MySQL 5.0. The storage_engine system variable (also known as table_type) is not yet replicated, which is a good thing for replication between different storage engines.
Starting from MySQL 5.0.3 (master and slave), replication works even if the master and slave have different global character set variables. Starting from MySQL 5.0.4 (master and slave), replication works even if the master and slave have different global time zone variables.
The following applies to replication between MySQL servers that use different character sets:
1. If the master uses MySQL 4.1, you must always use the same global character set and collation on the master and the slave, regardless of the MySQL version running on the slave. (These are controlled by the --character-set-server and --collation-server options.) Otherwise, you may get duplicate-key errors on the slave, because a key that is unique in the master character set might not be unique in the slave character set. Note that this is not a cause for concern when master and slave are both MySQL 5.0 or later.
2. If the master is older than MySQL 4.1.3, the character set of any client should never be made different from its global value because this character set change is not known to the slave. In other words, clients should not use SET NAMES, SET CHARACTER SET, and so forth. If both the master and the slave are 4.1.3 or newer, clients can freely set session values for character set variables because these settings are written to the binary log and so are known to the slave. That is, clients can use SET NAMES or SET CHARACTER SET or can set variables such as collation_client or collation_server. However, clients are prevented from changing the global value of these variables; as stated previously, the master and slave must always have identical global character set values.
3. If you have databases on the master with character sets that differ from the global character_set_server value, you should design your CREATE TABLE statements so that tables in those databases do not implicitly rely on the database default character set (see Bug #2326). A good workaround is to state the character set and collation explicitly in CREATE TABLE statements.
If the master uses MySQL 4.1, the same system time zone should be set for both master and slave. Otherwise some statements will not be replicated properly, such as statements that use the NOW() or FROM_UNIXTIME() functions. You can set the time zone in which MySQL server runs by using the --timezone=timezone_name option of the mysqld_safe script or by setting the TZ environment variable. Both master and slave should also have the same default connection time zone setting; that is, the --default-time-zone parameter should have the same value for both master and slave. Note that this is not necessary when the master is MySQL 5.0 or later.

CONVERT_TZ(...,...,@@global.time_zone) is not properly replicated. CONVERT_TZ(...,...,@@session.time_zone) is properly replicated only if the master and slave are from MySQL 5.0.4 or newer.

Session variables are not replicated properly when used in statements that update tables. For example, SET MAX_JOIN_SIZE=1000 followed by INSERT INTO mytable VALUES(@@MAX_JOIN_SIZE) will not insert the same data on the master and the slave. This does not apply to the common sequence of SET TIME_ZONE=... followed by INSERT INTO mytable VALUES(CONVERT_TZ(...,...,@@time_zone)), which replicates correctly as of MySQL 5.0.4.

It is possible to replicate transactional tables on the master using non-transactional tables on the slave. For example, you can replicate an InnoDB master table as a MyISAM slave table. However, if you do this, there are problems if the slave is stopped in the middle of a BEGIN/COMMIT block because the slave restarts at the beginning of the BEGIN block.

Update statements that refer to user-defined variables (that is, variables of the form @var_name) are replicated correctly in MySQL 5.0. However, this is not true for versions prior to 4.1. Note that user variable names are case insensitive starting in MySQL 5.0. You should take this into account when setting up replication between MySQL 5.0 and older versions.

Slaves can connect to masters using SSL.

Views are always replicated to slaves. Views are filtered by their own name, not by the tables they refer to. This means that a view can be replicated to the slave even if the view contains a table that would normally be filtered out by replication-ignore-table rules. Care should therefore be taken to ensure that views do not replicate table data that would normally be filtered for security reasons.

In MySQL 5.0 (starting from 5.0.3), there is a global system variable slave_transaction_retries: If the replication slave SQL thread fails to execute a transaction because of an InnoDB deadlock or because it exceeded the InnoDB innodb_lock_wait_timeout or the NDBCluster TransactionDeadlockDetectionTimeout or TransactionInactiveTimeout value, the transaction automatically retries slave_transaction_retries times before stopping with an error. The default value is 10. Starting from MySQL 5.0.4, the total retry count can be seen in the output of SHOW STATUS; see Section 5.2.4, “Server Status Variables”.

If a DATA DIRECTORY or INDEX DIRECTORY table option is used in a CREATE TABLE statement on the master server, the table option is also used on the slave. This can cause problems if no corresponding directory exists in the slave host filesystem or if it exists but is not accessible to the slave server. MySQL supports an sql_mode option called NO_DIR_IN_CREATE. If the slave server is run with this SQL mode enabled, it ignores the DATA DIRECTORY and INDEX DIRECTORY table options when replicating CREATE TABLE statements. The result is that MyISAM data and index files are created in the table's database directory.

It is possible for the data on the master and slave to become different if a statement is designed in such a way that the data modification is non-deterministic; that is, left to the will of the query optimizer. (This is in general not a good practice, even outside of replication.) For a detailed explanation of this issue, see Section A.8.1, “Open Issues in MySQL”.

Using LOAD TABLE FROM MASTER where the master is running MySQL 4.1 and the slave is running MySQL 5.0 may corrupt the table data, and is not supported. (Bug #16261)

The following applies only if either the master or the slave is running MySQL version 5.0.3 or older: If on the master a LOAD DATA INFILE is interrupted (integrity constraint violation, killed connection, and so on), the slave skips the LOAD DATA INFILE entirely. This means that if this command permanently inserted or updated table records before being interrupted, these modifications are not replicated to the slave.

Some forms of the FLUSH statement are not logged because they could cause problems if replicated to a slave: FLUSH LOGS, FLUSH MASTER, FLUSH SLAVE, and FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK. For a syntax example, see Section 13.5.5.2, “FLUSH Syntax”. The FLUSH TABLES, ANALYZE TABLE, OPTIMIZE TABLE, and REPAIR TABLE statements are written to the binary log and thus replicated to slaves. This is not normally a problem because these statements do not modify table data. However, this can cause difficulties under certain circumstances. If you replicate the privilege tables in the mysql database and update those tables directly without using GRANT, you must issue a FLUSH PRIVILEGES on the slaves to put the new privileges into effect. In addition, if you use FLUSH TABLES when renaming a MyISAM table that is part of a MERGE table, you must issue FLUSH TABLES manually on the slaves. These statements are written to the binary log unless you specify NO_WRITE_TO_BINLOG or its alias LOCAL.

MySQL supports only one master and many slaves. In the future we plan to add a voting algorithm for changing the master automatically in the event of problems with the current master. We also plan to introduce agent processes to help perform load balancing by sending SELECT queries to different slaves.

When a server shuts down and restarts, its MEMORY (HEAP tables become empty. The master replicates this effect to slaves as follows: The first time that the master uses each MEMORY table after startup, it logs an event that notifies the slaves that the table needs to be emptied by writing a DELETE statement for that table to the binary log. See Section 14.4, “The MEMORY (HEAP) Storage Engine”, for more information.

Temporary tables are replicated except in the case where you shut down the slave server (not just the slave threads) and you have replicated temporary tables that are used in updates that have not yet been executed on the slave. If you shut down the slave server, the temporary tables needed by those updates are no longer available when the slave is restarted. To avoid this problem, do not shut down the slave while it has temporary tables open. Instead, use the following procedure:

Issue a STOP SLAVE statement.

Use SHOW STATUS to check the value of the Slave_open_temp_tables variable.

If the value is 0, issue a mysqladmin shutdown command to stop the slave.

If the value is not 0, restart the slave threads with START SLAVE.

Repeat the procedure later until the Slave_open_temp_tables variable is 0 and you can stop the slave.

The syntax for multiple-table DELETE statements that use table aliases changed between MySQL 4.0 and 4.1. In MySQL 4.0, you should use the true table name to refer to any table from which rows should be deleted:

DELETE test FROM test AS t1, test2 WHERE ...

In MySQL 4.1, you must use the alias:

DELETE t1 FROM test AS t1, test2 WHERE ...

If you use such DELETE statements, the change in syntax means that a 4.0 master cannot replicate to 4.1 (or higher) slaves.

It is safe to connect servers in a circular master/slave relationship if you use the --log-slave-updates option. That means that you can create a setup such as this:

A -> B -> C -> A

However, many statements do not work correctly in this kind of setup unless your client code is written to take care of the potential problems that can occur from updates that occur in different sequence on different servers.

Server IDs are encoded in binary log events, so server A knows when an event that it reads was originally created by itself and does not execute the event (unless server A was started with the --replicate-same-server-id option, which is meaningful only in rare cases). Thus, there are no infinite loops. This type of circular setup works only if you perform no conflicting updates between the tables. In other words, if you insert data in both A and C, you should never insert a row in A that may have a key that conflicts with a row inserted in C. You should also not update the same rows on two servers if the order in which the updates are applied is significant.

If a statement on a slave produces an error, the slave SQL thread terminates, and the slave writes a message to its error log. You should then connect to the slave manually and determine the cause of the problem. (SHOW SLAVE STATUS is useful for this.) Then fix the problem (for example, you might need to create a non-existent table) and run START SLAVE.

It is safe to shut down a master server and restart it later. When a slave loses its connection to the master, the slave tries to reconnect immediately and retries periodically if that fails. The default is to retry every 60 seconds. This may be changed with the --master-connect-retry option. A slave also is able to deal with network connectivity outages. However, the slave notices the network outage only after receiving no data from the master for slave_net_timeout seconds. If your outages are short, you may want to decrease slave_net_timeout. See Section 5.2.2, “Server System Variables”.

Shutting down the slave (cleanly) is also safe because it keeps track of where it left off. Unclean shutdowns might produce problems, especially if the disk cache was not flushed to disk before the system went down. Your system fault tolerance is greatly increased if you have a good uninterruptible power supply. Unclean shutdowns of the master may cause inconsistencies between the content of tables and the binary log in master; this can be avoided by using InnoDB tables and the --innodb-safe-binlog option on the master. See Section 5.12.3, “The Binary Log”.

Note: --innodb-safe-binlog is unneeded as of MySQL 5.0.3, having been made obsolete by the introduction of XA transaction support.

A crash on the master side can result in the master's binary log having a final position less than the most recent position read by the slave, due to the master's binary log file not being flushed. This can cause the slave not to be able to replicate when the master comes back up. Setting sync_binlog=1 in the master my.cnf file helps to minimize this problem because it causes the master to flush its binary log more frequently.

Due to the non-transactional nature of MyISAM tables, it is possible to have a statement that only partially updates a table and returns an error code. This can happen, for example, on a multiple-row insert that has one row violating a key constraint, or if a long update statement is killed after updating some of the rows. If that happens on the master, the slave thread exits and waits for the database administrator to decide what to do about it unless the error code is legitimate and execution of the statement results in the same error code on the slave. If this error code validation behavior is not desirable, some or all errors can be masked out (ignored) with the --slave-skip-errors option.

If you update transactional tables from non-transactional tables inside a BEGIN/COMMIT sequence, updates to the binary log may be out of synchrony with table states if the non-transactional table is updated before the transaction commits. This occurs because the transaction is written to the binary log only when it is committed.

In situations where transactions mix updates to transactional and non-transactional tables, the order of statements in the binary log is correct, and all needed statements are written to the binary log even in case of a ROLLBACK. However, when a second connection updates the non-transactional table before the first connection's transaction is complete, statements can be logged out of order, because the second connection's update is written immediately after it is performed, regardless of the state of the transaction being performed by the first connection.

Floating-point values are approximate, so comparisons involving them are inexact. This is true for operations that use floating-point values explicitly, or values that are converted to floating-point implicitly. Comparisons of floating-point values might yield different results on master and slave servers due to differences in computer architecture, the compiler used to build MySQL, and so forth. See Section 12.1.2, “Type Conversion in Expression Evaluation”, and Section A.5.8, “Problems with Floating-Point Comparisons”.

previous page start next page