The Spring team considers developer testing to be an absolutely integral part of enterprise software development. A thorough treatment of testing in the enterprise is beyond the scope of this chapter; rather, the focus here is on the value add that the adoption of the IoC principle can bring to unit testing; and on the benefits that the Spring Framework provides in integration testing.
One of the main benefits of Dependency Injection is that your code
is much less likely to have any hidden dependencies on the runtime
environment or other configuration subsystems. This allows for unit tests
to be written in a manner such that the object under test can be simply
instantiated with the new
operator and have its
dependences set in the unit test code. You can use mock objects (in
conjunction with many other valuable testing techniques) to test your code
in isolation. If you follow the architecture recommendations around Spring
you will find that the resulting clean layering and componentization of
your codebase will naturally faciliate easier unit
testing. For example, you will be able to test service layer objects by
stubbing or mocking DAO interfaces, without any need to access persistent
data while running unit tests.
True unit tests typically will run extremely quickly, as there is no runtime infrastructure to set up, i.e., database, ORM tool, or whatever. Thus emphasizing true unit tests as part of your development methodology will boost your productivity. The upshot of this is that you do not need this section of the testing chapter to help you write effective unit tests for your IoC-based applications.
However, it is also important to be able to perform some integration testing enabling you to test things such as:
-
The correct wiring of your Spring IoC container contexts.
-
Data access using ADO.NET or an ORM tool. This would include such things such as the correctness of SQL statements / or NHibernate XML mapping files.
The Spring Framework provides first class support for integration
testing in the form of the classes that are packaged in the Spring.Testing.NUnit.dll
library.
Please note that these test classes are NUnit-specific. Support
for mbUnit and VSTS are under consideration for future
versions.
Note | |
---|---|
The Spring.Testing.NUnit.dll library is compiled against NUnit 2.4.1. At the time of this writing the latest version of NUnit is 2.4.6. Note that add-in have their own versions of NUnit they use. For example, ReSharper 3.0 uses 2.2.8. If you are using the GUI-runner that comes with NUnit then you should add the following to your .config file, (in the form of MyAssembly.dll.config) <runtime> <assemblyBinding xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1"> <dependentAssembly> <assemblyIdentity name="nunit.framework" publicKeyToken="96d09a1eb7f44a77" culture="neutral"/> <bindingRedirect oldVersion="0.0.0.0-65535.65535.65535.65535 newVersion="2.4.6.0"/> </dependentAssembly> </assemblyBinding> </runtime> |
The Spring.Testing.NUnit
namespace provides
valuable NUnit TestCase
superclasses for
integration testing using a Spring container. Note that as of NUnit 2.4
these can be rewritten in terms of custom attributes via NUnit's new
extensibility mechanism. This will be an additional option in an upcoming
release of Spring.NET and is already present in the Java version of the
Spring framework.
These superclasses provide the following functionality:
-
Spring IoC container caching between test case execution.
-
The pretty-much-transparent Dependency Injection of test fixture instances (this is nice).
-
Transaction management appropriate to integration testing (this is even nicer).
-
A number of Spring-specific inherited instance variables that are really useful when integration testing.
The Spring.Testing.NUnit
package provides support for consistent loading of Spring contexts, and
caching of loaded contexts. Support for the caching of loaded contexts
is important, because if you are working on a large project, startup
time may become an issue - not because of the overhead of Spring itself,
but because the objects instantiated by the Spring container will
themselves take time to instantiate. For example, a project with 50-100
NHibernate mapping files might take 10-20 seconds to load the mapping
files, and incurring that cost before running every single test case in
every single test fixture will lead to slower overall test runs that
could reduce productivity.
To address this issue, the
AbstractDependencyInjectionSpringContextTests
has
an protected
property that subclasses must implement
to provide the location of context definition files:
protected abstract string[] ConfigLocations { get; }
Implementations of this method must provide an array containing
the IResource locations of XML configuration metadata used to configure
the application. This will be the same, or nearly the same, as the list
of configuration locations specified in
App.config/Web.config
or other deployment
configuration.
By default, once loaded, the configuration file set will be reused
for each test case. Thus the setup cost will be incurred only once (per
test fixture), and subsequent test execution will be much faster. In the
unlikely case that a test may 'dirty' the config location, requiring
reloading - for example, by changing an object definition or the state
of an application object - you can call the
SetDirty()
method on
AbstractDependencyInjectionSpringContextTests
to
cause the test fixture to reload the configurations and rebuild the
application context before executing the next test case.
When
AbstractDependencyInjectionSpringContextTests
(and subclasses) load your application context, they can optionally
configure instances of your test classes by Setter Injection. All you
need to do is to define instance variables and the corresponding
setters.
AbstractDependencyInjectionSpringContextTests
will automatically locate the corresponding object in the set of
configuration files specified in the
ConfigLocations
property.
Consider the scenario where we have a class,
HibernateTitleDao
, that performs data access
logic for say, the Title
domain object. We want
to write integration tests that test all of the following areas:
-
The Spring configuration; basically, is everything related to the configuration of the
HibernateTitleDao
object correct and present? -
The Hibernate mapping file configuration; is everything mapped correctly and are the correct lazy-loading settings in place?
-
The logic of the
HibernateTitleDao
; does the configured instance of this class perform as anticipated?
Let's look at the test class itself (we will look at the configuration immediately afterwards).
[TestFixture] public class HibernateTitleDaoTests : AbstractDependencyInjectionSpringContextTests { // this instance will be (automatically) dependency injected private HibernateTitleDao titleDao; // a setter method to enable DI of the 'titleDao' instance variable public HibernateTitleDao HibernateTitleDao { set { titleDao = value; } } [Test] public void LoadTitle() { Title title = this.titleDao.LoadTitle(10); Assert.IsNotNull(title); } // specifies the Spring configuration to load for this test fixture protected override string[] ConfigLocations { return new String[] { "assembly://MyAssembly/MyNamespace/daos.xml" }; } }
The file referenced by the ConfigLocations method
('classpath:com/foo/daos.xml'
) looks like
this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<objects xmlns="http://www.springframework.net">
<!-- this object will be injected into the HibernateTitleDaoTests
class -->
<object id="titleDao" type="Spring.Samples.HibernateTitleDao, Spring.Samples">
<property name="sessionFactory" ref="sessionFactory"/>
</object>
<object id="sessionFactory" type="Spring.Data.NHibernate.LocalSessionFactoryObject, Spring.Data.NHibernate">
<!-- dependencies elided for clarity -->
</object>
</objects>
The
AbstractDependencyInjectionSpringContextTests
classes uses autowire
by type. Thus if you have multiple object definitions
of the same type, you cannot rely on this approach for those particular
object. In that case, you can use the inherited
applicationContext
instance variable, and explicit
lookup using (for example) an explicit call to
applicationContext.GetObject("titleDao")
.
If you don't want dependency injection applied to your test cases,
simply don't declare any set properties. Alternatively, you can extend
the AbstractSpringContextTests
- the root of the
class hierarchy in the Spring.Testing.NUnit
namespace. It merely contains convenience methods to load Spring
contexts, and performs no Dependency Injection of the test
fixture.
If, for whatever reason, you don't fancy having setter
properties in your test fixtures, Spring can (in this one case) inject
dependencies into protected
fields. Find below a
reworking of the previous example to use field level injection (the
Spring XML configuration does not need to change, merely the test
fixture).
[TestFixture] public class HibernateTitleDaoTests : AbstractDependencyInjectionSpringContextTests{ public HibernateTitleDaoTests() { // switch on field level injection PopulateProtectedVariables = true; } // this instance will be (automatically) dependency injected protected HibernateTitleDao titleDao; [Test] public void LoadTitle() { Title title = this.titleDao.LoadTitle(10); Assert.IsNotNull(title); } // specifies the Spring configuration to load for this test fixture protected override string[] ConfigLocations { return new String[] { "assembly://MyAssembly/MyNamespace/daos.xml" }; } }
In the case of field injection, there is no autowiring going on:
the name of your protected
instances variable(s)
are used as the lookup object name in the configured Spring
container.
One common issue in tests that access a real database is their effect on the state of the persistence store. Even when you're using a development database, changes to the state may affect future tests. Also, many operations - such as inserting to or modifying persistent data - cannot be done (or verified) outside a transaction.
The
AbstractTransactionalDbProviderSpringContextTests
superclass (and subclasses) exist to meet this need. By default, they
create and roll back a transaction for each test. You simply write code
that can assume the existence of a transaction. If you call
transactionally proxied objects in your tests, they will behave
correctly, according to their transactional semantics.
AbstractTransactionalSpringContextTests
depends on a IPlatformTransactionManager
object
being defined in the application context. The name doesn't matter, due
to the use of autowire by type.
Typically you will extend the subclass,
AbstractTransactionalDbProviderSpringContextTests
.
This also requires that a DbProvider
object
definition - again, with any name - be present in the configurations. It
creates an AdoTemplate
instance variable that is
useful for convenient querying, and provides handy methods to delete the
contents of selected tables (remember that the transaction will roll
back by default, so this is safe to do).
If you want a transaction to commit - unusual, but occasionally
useful when you want a particular test to populate the database - you
can call the SetComplete()
method inherited
from AbstractTransactionalSpringContextTests
.
This will cause the transaction to commit instead of roll back.
There is also convenient ability to end a transaction before the
test case ends, through calling the
EndTransaction()
method. This will roll back
the transaction by default, and commit it only if
SetComplete()
had previously been called. This
functionality is useful if you want to test the behavior of
'disconnected' data objects, such as Hibernate-mapped objects that will
be used in a web or remoting tier outside a transaction. Often, lazy
loading errors are discovered only through UI testing; if you call
EndTransaction()
you can ensure correct
operation of the UI through your NUnit test suite.
When you extend the
AbstractTransactionalDbProviderSpringContextTests
class you will have access to the following protected
instance variables:
-
applicationContext
(aIConfigurableApplicationContext
): inherited from theAbstractDependencyInjectionSpringContextTests
superclass. Use this to perform explicit object lookup, or test the state of the context as a whole. -
adoTemplate
: inherited fromAbstractTransactionalDbProviderSpringContextTests
. Useful for querying to confirm state. For example, you might query before and after testing application code that creates an object and persists it using an ORM tool, to verify that the data appears in the database. (Spring will ensure that the query runs in the scope of the same transaction.) You will need to tell your ORM tool to 'flush' its changes for this to work correctly, for example using theFlush()
method on NHibernate'sISession
interface.
Often you will provide an application-wide superclass for integration tests that provides further useful instance variables used in many tests
This section contains links to further resources about testing in general.
-
The NUnit homepage. The Spring Framework's unit test suite is written using NUnit as the testing framework.