ConcurrentReaderHashMap.Entry (dom4j 1.6.1 API)

dom4j

previous page next page

Overview

Package

Class

Use

Tree

Deprecated

Index

Help

PREV CLASS NEXT CLASS

FRAMES NO FRAMES

SUMMARY: NESTED | FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD

DETAIL: FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD

org.dom4j.tree Class ConcurrentReaderHashMap.Entry

java.lang.Object
  org.dom4j.tree.ConcurrentReaderHashMap.Entry

All Implemented Interfaces:: Map.Entry

Enclosing class:: org.dom4j.tree.ConcurrentReaderHashMap

protected static class ConcurrentReaderHashMap.Entry
extends Object
implements Map.Entry

ConcurrentReaderHashMap collision list entry.

Field Summary
`protected int`	`hash`
`protected Object`	`key`
`protected ConcurrentReaderHashMap.Entry`	`next`
`protected Object`	`value`

Method Summary
`boolean`	`equals(Object o)`
`Object`	`getKey()`
`Object`	`getValue()` Get the value.
`int`	`hashCode()`
`Object`	`setValue(Object value)` Set the value of this entry.
`String`	`toString()`

Methods inherited from class java.lang.Object

clone, finalize, getClass, notify, notifyAll, wait, wait, wait

Field Detail

hash

protected final int hash

key

protected final Object key

protected final ConcurrentReaderHashMap.Entry next

value

protected volatile Object value

Method Detail

getKey

public Object getKey()

Specified by:: getKey in interface Map.Entry

getValue

public Object getValue()

Get the value. Note: In an entrySet or entrySet.iterator, unless the set or iterator is used under synchronization of the table as a whole (or you can otherwise guarantee lack of concurrent modification), getValue might return null, reflecting the fact that the entry has been concurrently removed. However, there are no assurances that concurrent removals will be reflected using this method.

Specified by:: getValue in interface Map.Entry

Returns:: the current value, or null if the entry has been detectably removed.

setValue

public Object setValue(Object value)

Set the value of this entry. Note: In an entrySet or entrySet.iterator), unless the set or iterator is used under synchronization of the table as a whole (or you can otherwise guarantee lack of concurrent modification), setValue is not strictly guaranteed to actually replace the value field obtained via the get operation of the underlying hash table in multithreaded applications. If iterator-wide synchronization is not used, and any other concurrent put or remove operations occur, sometimes even to other entries, then this change is not guaranteed to be reflected in the hash table. (It might, or it might not. There are no assurances either way.)