27.4. The Python Profilers
27.4.1. Introduction to the profilers
profile provide deterministic profiling of
Python programs. A profile is a set of statistics that describes how
often and for how long various parts of the program executed. These statistics
can be formatted into reports via the
The Python standard library provides two different implementations of the same profiling interface:
cProfileis recommended for most users; it’s a C extension with reasonable overhead that makes it suitable for profiling long-running programs. Based on
lsprof, contributed by Brett Rosen and Ted Czotter.
profile, a pure Python module whose interface is imitated by
cProfile, but which adds significant overhead to profiled programs. If you’re trying to extend the profiler in some way, the task might be easier with this module.
The profiler modules are designed to provide an execution profile for a given
program, not for benchmarking purposes (for that, there is
reasonably accurate results). This particularly applies to benchmarking
Python code against C code: the profilers introduce overhead for Python code,
but not for C-level functions, and so the C code would seem faster than any
27.4.2. Instant User’s Manual
This section is provided for users that “don’t want to read the manual.” It provides a very brief overview, and allows a user to rapidly perform profiling on an existing application.
To profile a function that takes a single argument, you can do:
import cProfile import re cProfile.run('re.compile("foo|bar")')
The above action would run
re.compile() and print profile results like
197 function calls (192 primitive calls) in 0.002 seconds Ordered by: standard name ncalls tottime percall cumtime percall filename:lineno(function) 1 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 <string>:1(<module>) 1 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 re.py:212(compile) 1 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 re.py:268(_compile) 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 sre_compile.py:172(_compile_charset) 1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 sre_compile.py:201(_optimize_charset) 4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 sre_compile.py:25(_identityfunction) 3/1 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 sre_compile.py:33(_compile)
The first line indicates that 197 calls were monitored. Of those calls, 192
were primitive, meaning that the call was not induced via recursion. The
Ordered by: standard name, indicates that the text string in the
far right column was used to sort the output. The column headings include:
- for the number of calls,
- for the total time spent in the given function (and excluding time made in calls to sub-functions)
- is the quotient of
- is the cumulative time spent in this and all subfunctions (from invocation till exit). This figure is accurate even for recursive functions.
- is the quotient of
cumtimedivided by primitive calls
- provides the respective data of each function
When there are two numbers in the first column (for example
3/1), it means
that the function recursed. The second value is the number of primitive calls
and the former is the total number of calls. Note that when the function does
not recurse, these two values are the same, and only the single figure is
Instead of printing the output at the end of the profile run, you can save the
results to a file by specifying a filename to the
import cProfile import re cProfile.run('re.compile("foo|bar")', 'restats')
pstats.Stats class reads profile results from a file and formats
them in various ways.
cProfile can also be invoked as a script to profile another
script. For example:
python -m cProfile [-o output_file] [-s sort_order] myscript.py
-o writes the profile results to a file instead of to stdout
-s specifies one of the
sort_stats() sort values to sort
the output by. This only applies when
-o is not supplied.
import pstats p = pstats.Stats('restats') p.strip_dirs().sort_stats(-1).print_stats()
strip_dirs() method removed the extraneous path from all
the module names. The
sort_stats() method sorted all the
entries according to the standard module/line/name string that is printed. The
print_stats() method printed out all the statistics. You
might try the following sort calls:
The first call will actually sort the list by function name, and the second call will print out the statistics. The following are some interesting calls to experiment with:
This sorts the profile by cumulative time in a function, and then only prints the ten most significant lines. If you want to understand what algorithms are taking time, the above line is what you would use.
If you were looking to see what functions were looping a lot, and taking a lot of time, you would do:
to sort according to time spent within each function, and then print the statistics for the top ten functions.
You might also try:
This will sort all the statistics by file name, and then print out statistics
for only the class init methods (since they are spelled with
them). As one final example, you could try:
p.sort_stats('time', 'cumulative').print_stats(.5, 'init')
This line sorts statistics with a primary key of time, and a secondary key of
cumulative time, and then prints out some of the statistics. To be specific, the
list is first culled down to 50% (re:
.5) of its original size, then only
init are maintained, and that sub-sub-list is printed.
If you wondered what functions called the above functions, you could now (
is still sorted according to the last criteria) do:
and you would get a list of callers for each of the listed functions.
If you want more functionality, you’re going to have to read the manual, or guess what the following functions do:
run(command, filename=None, sort=-1)
This function takes a single argument that can be passed to the
exec()function, and an optional file name. In all cases this routine executes:
exec(command, __main__.__dict__, __main__.__dict__)
and gathers profiling statistics from the execution. If no file name is present, then this function automatically creates a
Statsinstance and prints a simple profiling report. If the sort value is specified it is passed to this
Statsinstance to control how the results are sorted.
runctx(command, globals, locals, filename=None)
This function is similar to
run(), with added arguments to supply the globals and locals dictionaries for the command string. This routine executes:
exec(command, globals, locals)
and gathers profiling statistics as in the
Profile(timer=None, timeunit=0.0, subcalls=True, builtins=True)
This class is normally only used if more precise control over profiling is needed than what the
A custom timer can be supplied for measuring how long code takes to run via the timer argument. This must be a function that returns a single number representing the current time. If the number is an integer, the timeunit specifies a multiplier that specifies the duration of each unit of time. For example, if the timer returns times measured in thousands of seconds, the time unit would be
Directly using the
Profileclass allows formatting profile results without writing the profile data to a file:
import cProfile, pstats, io pr = cProfile.Profile() pr.enable() # ... do something ... pr.disable() s = io.StringIO() sortby = 'cumulative' ps = pstats.Stats(pr, stream=s).sort_stats(sortby) ps.print_stats() print(s.getvalue())
Start collecting profiling data.
Stop collecting profiling data.
Stop collecting profiling data and record the results internally as the current profile.
Statsobject based on the current profile and print the results to stdout.
Write the results of the current profile to filename.
Profile the cmd via
runctx(cmd, globals, locals)
Profile the cmd via
exec()with the specified global and local environment.
runcall(func, *args, **kwargs)
Analysis of the profiler data is done using the
Stats(*filenames or profile, stream=sys.stdout)
This class constructor creates an instance of a “statistics object” from a filename (or list of filenames) or from a
Profileinstance. Output will be printed to the stream specified by stream.
The file selected by the above constructor must have been created by the corresponding version of
cProfile. To be specific, there is no file compatibility guaranteed with future versions of this profiler, and there is no compatibility with files produced by other profilers. If several files are provided, all the statistics for identical functions will be coalesced, so that an overall view of several processes can be considered in a single report. If additional files need to be combined with data in an existing
add()method can be used.
Instead of reading the profile data from a file, a
profile.Profileobject can be used as the profile data source.
Statsobjects have the following methods:
This method for the
Statsclass removes all leading path information from file names. It is very useful in reducing the size of the printout to fit within (close to) 80 columns. This method modifies the object, and the stripped information is lost. After performing a strip operation, the object is considered to have its entries in a “random” order, as it was just after object initialization and loading. If
strip_dirs()causes two function names to be indistinguishable (they are on the same line of the same filename, and have the same function name), then the statistics for these two entries are accumulated into a single entry.
This method of the
Statsclass accumulates additional profiling information into the current profiling object. Its arguments should refer to filenames created by the corresponding version of
cProfile.run(). Statistics for identically named (re: file, line, name) functions are automatically accumulated into single function statistics.
Save the data loaded into the
Statsobject to a file named filename. The file is created if it does not exist, and is overwritten if it already exists. This is equivalent to the method of the same name on the
This method modifies the
Statsobject by sorting it according to the supplied criteria. The argument is typically a string identifying the basis of a sort (example:
When more than one key is provided, then additional keys are used as secondary criteria when there is equality in all keys selected before them. For example,
sort_stats('name', 'file')will sort all the entries according to their function name, and resolve all ties (identical function names) by sorting by file name.
Abbreviations can be used for any key names, as long as the abbreviation is unambiguous. The following are the keys currently defined:
Valid Arg Meaning
primitive call count
Note that all sorts on statistics are in descending order (placing most time consuming items first), where as name, file, and line number searches are in ascending order (alphabetical). The subtle distinction between
'stdname'is that the standard name is a sort of the name as printed, which means that the embedded line numbers get compared in an odd way. For example, lines 3, 20, and 40 would (if the file names were the same) appear in the string order 20, 3 and 40. In contrast,
'nfl'does a numeric compare of the line numbers. In fact,
sort_stats('nfl')is the same as
sort_stats('name', 'file', 'line').
For backward-compatibility reasons, the numeric arguments
2are permitted. They are interpreted as
'cumulative'respectively. If this old style format (numeric) is used, only one sort key (the numeric key) will be used, and additional arguments will be silently ignored.
This method for the
Statsclass reverses the ordering of the basic list within the object. Note that by default ascending vs descending order is properly selected based on the sort key of choice.
The arguments provided (if any) can be used to limit the list down to the significant entries. Initially, the list is taken to be the complete set of profiled functions. Each restriction is either an integer (to select a count of lines), or a decimal fraction between 0.0 and 1.0 inclusive (to select a percentage of lines), or a regular expression (to pattern match the standard name that is printed. If several restrictions are provided, then they are applied sequentially. For example:
would first limit the printing to first 10% of list, and then only print functions that were part of filename
.*foo:. In contrast, the command:
would limit the list to all functions having file names
.*foo:, and then proceed to only print the first 10% of them.
This method for the
Statsclass prints a list of all functions that called each function in the profiled database. The ordering is identical to that provided by
print_stats(), and the definition of the restricting argument is also identical. Each caller is reported on its own line. The format differs slightly depending on the profiler that produced the stats:
profile, a number is shown in parentheses after each caller to show how many times this specific call was made. For convenience, a second non-parenthesized number repeats the cumulative time spent in the function at the right.
cProfile, each caller is preceded by three numbers: the number of times this specific call was made, and the total and cumulative times spent in the current function while it was invoked by this specific caller.
27.4.5. What Is Deterministic Profiling?
Deterministic profiling is meant to reflect the fact that all function call, function return, and exception events are monitored, and precise timings are made for the intervals between these events (during which time the user’s code is executing). In contrast, statistical profiling (which is not done by this module) randomly samples the effective instruction pointer, and deduces where time is being spent. The latter technique traditionally involves less overhead (as the code does not need to be instrumented), but provides only relative indications of where time is being spent.
In Python, since there is an interpreter active during execution, the presence of instrumented code is not required to do deterministic profiling. Python automatically provides a hook (optional callback) for each event. In addition, the interpreted nature of Python tends to add so much overhead to execution, that deterministic profiling tends to only add small processing overhead in typical applications. The result is that deterministic profiling is not that expensive, yet provides extensive run time statistics about the execution of a Python program.
Call count statistics can be used to identify bugs in code (surprising counts), and to identify possible inline-expansion points (high call counts). Internal time statistics can be used to identify “hot loops” that should be carefully optimized. Cumulative time statistics should be used to identify high level errors in the selection of algorithms. Note that the unusual handling of cumulative times in this profiler allows statistics for recursive implementations of algorithms to be directly compared to iterative implementations.
One limitation has to do with accuracy of timing information. There is a fundamental problem with deterministic profilers involving accuracy. The most obvious restriction is that the underlying “clock” is only ticking at a rate (typically) of about .001 seconds. Hence no measurements will be more accurate than the underlying clock. If enough measurements are taken, then the “error” will tend to average out. Unfortunately, removing this first error induces a second source of error.
The second problem is that it “takes a while” from when an event is dispatched until the profiler’s call to get the time actually gets the state of the clock. Similarly, there is a certain lag when exiting the profiler event handler from the time that the clock’s value was obtained (and then squirreled away), until the user’s code is once again executing. As a result, functions that are called many times, or call many functions, will typically accumulate this error. The error that accumulates in this fashion is typically less than the accuracy of the clock (less than one clock tick), but it can accumulate and become very significant.
The problem is more important with
profile than with the lower-overhead
cProfile. For this reason,
profile provides a means of
calibrating itself for a given platform so that this error can be
probabilistically (on the average) removed. After the profiler is calibrated, it
will be more accurate (in a least square sense), but it will sometimes produce
negative numbers (when call counts are exceptionally low, and the gods of
probability work against you :-). ) Do not be alarmed by negative numbers in
the profile. They should only appear if you have calibrated your profiler,
and the results are actually better than without calibration.
The profiler of the
profile module subtracts a constant from each event
handling time to compensate for the overhead of calling the time function, and
socking away the results. By default, the constant is 0. The following
procedure can be used to obtain a better constant for a given platform (see
import profile pr = profile.Profile() for i in range(5): print(pr.calibrate(10000))
The method executes the number of Python calls given by the argument, directly and again under the profiler, measuring the time for both. It then computes the hidden overhead per profiler event, and returns that as a float. For example, on a 1.8Ghz Intel Core i5 running Mac OS X, and using Python’s time.clock() as the timer, the magical number is about 4.04e-6.
The object of this exercise is to get a fairly consistent result. If your computer is very fast, or your timer function has poor resolution, you might have to pass 100000, or even 1000000, to get consistent results.
When you have a consistent answer, there are three ways you can use it:
import profile # 1. Apply computed bias to all Profile instances created hereafter. profile.Profile.bias = your_computed_bias # 2. Apply computed bias to a specific Profile instance. pr = profile.Profile() pr.bias = your_computed_bias # 3. Specify computed bias in instance constructor. pr = profile.Profile(bias=your_computed_bias)
If you have a choice, you are better off choosing a smaller constant, and then your results will “less often” show up as negative in profile statistics.
27.4.8. Using a custom timer
If you want to change how current time is determined (for example, to force use
of wall-clock time or elapsed process time), pass the timing function you want
Profile class constructor:
pr = profile.Profile(your_time_func)
The resulting profiler will then call
your_time_func. Depending on whether
you are using
your_time_func‘s return value will be interpreted differently:
your_time_funcshould return a single number, or a list of numbers whose sum is the current time (like what
os.times()returns). If the function returns a single time number, or the list of returned numbers has length 2, then you will get an especially fast version of the dispatch routine.
Be warned that you should calibrate the profiler class for the timer function that you choose (see Calibration). For most machines, a timer that returns a lone integer value will provide the best results in terms of low overhead during profiling. (
os.times()is pretty bad, as it returns a tuple of floating point values). If you want to substitute a better timer in the cleanest fashion, derive a class and hardwire a replacement dispatch method that best handles your timer call, along with the appropriate calibration constant.
your_time_funcshould return a single number. If it returns integers, you can also invoke the class constructor with a second argument specifying the real duration of one unit of time. For example, if
your_integer_time_funcreturns times measured in thousands of seconds, you would construct the
Profileinstance as follows:
pr = cProfile.Profile(your_integer_time_func, 0.001)
cProfile.Profileclass cannot be calibrated, custom timer functions should be used with care and should be as fast as possible. For the best results with a custom timer, it might be necessary to hard-code it in the C source of the internal